Argument Against Human Cloning essays

Argument Against Human Cloning essays The idea of cloning humans has always stirred debate, raising moral and ethical issues. As research and experiments continue delve into the frontiers of technology and science, we inch closer to the possibility of cloning becoming a reality. In fact, it is unrealistic to assume it will never happen. To deal with the implications of cloning, we should hesitate to consider the cost cloning would have on society as a whole. Human cloning is unethical because we cannot know the results, because alters societal roles, and because it degrades humanity. As we move forward into the millennium, the cloned animal, Dolly, had already died prematurely. Efforts are made across the globe to create the first cloned human being without first considering the consequences. This paper will focus on the ethical and moral dilemmas surrounding the science of cloning and why it We should first understand our own limits and balance them with logical thinking. Ethics involves doing the right thing. In theory, cloning sounds like a great idea. However, in practice, it presents more problems than it can solve. Part of being a human being in a functioning society involves responsibility. Part of thinking about the future includes incorporating the law of unintended consequences. When we consider cloning, we must not blindly overlook its negative implications. Cloning always conjures up ideas of Dr. Frankenstein, who became a victim of his own desire for knowledge. Frankenstein and his hideous were indeed fictional characters, Mary Shelley understood the danger associated with the hunger for knowledge. In Frankenstein, Shelley warns us of the dangers of knowledge with the dying Victor Frankenstein tells Walton, "seek happiness in tranquility and avoid ambition, even if it be only the apparently innocent one of distinguishing yourself in science and discoveries" (Shelley 200) Clearly, Fran...